The Finance Act, 2023 has made the brand new tax regime underneath part 115BAC(1A) because the default tax regime for people/HUFs/AOPs (apart from co-operative societies)/BOIs and synthetic juridical individuals. Thereafter, vide the successive Finance Acts, the charges had been additional rationalized by the Finance No.2 Act 2024 and Finance Act 2025 –
Revenue tax fee for AY 2024-25, AY 2025-26, AY 2026-27
Finance Act, 2023 (A.Y.2024-25) | Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 (A.Y.2025-26) | Finance Act, 2025 (A.Y.2026-27) | ||||
Slabs | Price | Slabs | Price | Slabs | Price | |
Upto Rs.3,00,000 | Nil | Upto Rs.3,00,000 | Nil | Upto Rs.4,00,000 | Nil | |
Rs.3,00001–Rs.6,00,000 | 5% | Rs.3,00001–Rs.7,00,000 | 5% | Rs.4,00,001–Rs.8,00,000 | 5% | |
Rs.6,00001–Rs.9,00,000 | 10% | Rs.7,00001–Rs.10,00,000 | 10% | Rs.8,00001–Rs.12,00,000 | 10% | |
Rs.9,00001–Rs.12,00,000 | 15% | Rs.10,00001–Rs.12,00,000 | 15% | Rs.12,00001–Rs.16,00,000 | 15% | |
Rs.12,00001–Rs.15,00,000 | 20% | Rs.12,00001–Rs.15,00,000 | 20% | Rs.16,00001–Rs.20,00,000 | 20% | |
Above Rs.15,00,000 | 30% | Above Rs.15,00,000 | 30% | Rs.20,00,001- Rs.24,00,000 | 25% | |
|
|
|
| Above Rs.24,00,000 | 30% | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rebate u/s 87A for TI upto Rs.7 lakh | 25,000 | Rebate obtainable for TI upto Rs. 7 lakh | 25,000 | Rebate obtainable for TI upto Rs. 12 lakh | 60,000 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Whole tax for complete revenue of Rs.25 lakh | ||||||
| A.Y.2024-25 | A.Y.2025-26 |
| A.Y.2026-27 |
| |
Tax legal responsibility | 4,50,000 | 4,40,000 |
| 3,30,000 |
| |
Add: cess@4% |
18,000 |
17,600 |
|
13,200 |
| |
Whole tax legal responsibility | 4,68,000 | 4,57,600 |
| 3,43,200 |
| |
Concessional tax slabs and fee underneath new or default tax regime decrease tax legal responsibility
CA Charanjot Singh Nanda, President of ICAI. famous that nder the default tax regime underneath part 115BAC(1A), complete revenue is computed with out offering for exemptions/deductions in respect of LTC (u/s 10(5)), HRA u/s 10(13A), different allowances underneath part 10(14), curiosity deduction for self-occupied property, extra depreciation, contribution for scientific analysis, Chapter VI-A deductions u/s 80C/80CCC/80CCD(1)/(1A)/80D (medical insurance coverage premium)/80DD (deduction in respect of upkeep together with medical therapy of a dependent who’s an individual with incapacity)/80DDB(quantity paid for medical therapy of specified illnesses)/80TTA (curiosity on financial savings checking account)/80TTB (curiosity on deposits in case of senior residents and so forth.
Nonetheless, increased normal deduction of upto Rs.75,000is obtainable from A.Y.2025-26 underneath the default tax regime u/s 115BAC(1A) vis-à-vis the usual deduction of upto Rs.50,000 underneath the common provisions of the Act.
Additionally, from A.Y.2026-27, rebate u/s 87A is accessible for complete revenue of upto Rs.12 lakh underneath the default tax regime u/s 115BAC(1A); and the utmost rebate is Rs.60,000.
Nonetheless, underneath the elective tax regime as per the common provisions of the Act, rebate u/s 87A is accessible for complete revenue of Rs.5 lakh; and the utmost rebate is Rs.12,500.
Regardless that majority of the tax incentives will not be obtainable underneath the default tax regime u/s 115BAC(1A), the tax legal responsibility is way lowerunder this regime as in comparison with the tax computed underneath the conventional provisions of the Act. This is because of concessional tax slabs and charges underneath the default tax regime.
The tax slabs and charges for A.Y.2024-45/2025-26/2026-27 underneath the conventional provisions of the Act are given under –
Tax slab | Price |
Upto Rs.2,50,000 / Rs.3,00,000 (for senior residents) /Rs.5,00,000 (very senior residents) | Nil |
Rs.2,50,001 -Rs.5,00,000 | 5% |
Rs.5,00,001 – Rs.10,00,000 | 20% |
Above Rs.10,00,000 | 30% |
|
|
For complete revenue of Rs.25,00,000 for A.Y.2026-27 | Rs. |
Tax payable computed on the above charges if an assessee opts out of the default tax regime and pays tax as per the common provisions of the Act | 5,62,500 |
Add: Cess@4% | 22,500 |
Tax payable underneath the common provisions of the Act | 5,85,000 |
Tax payable underneath the default tax regime | 3,43,200 |
Profit to the assessee paying tax underneath the default tax regime | 2,41,800 |
The above could be the profit if no deductions are claimed by the assessee (underneath the common provisions of the Act).
Instance
Allow us to take the case of a salaried worker Mr. A who attracts a gross wage of Rs.30 lakh for A.Y.2026-27. He has curiosity on self-occupied property of Rs. 2 lakh, he has deposited Rs.1,50 lakh in PPF, paid medical insurance coverage premium of Rs.25,000, has curiosity on financial savings financial institution of Rs.20,000. We will compute his complete revenue underneath the default tax regime and regular provisions of the Act for A.Y.2026-27
| Default tax regime u/s 115BAC (1A) | Rs. | |
| Gross wage | 30,00,000 | |
| Much less: normal deduction | 75,000 | |
| Internet wage | 29,25,000 | |
| Curiosity on financial savings checking account | 20,000 | |
| Whole Revenue | 29,45,000 | |
|
|
| |
| Tax payable | 4,63,500 | |
| Add: cess@4% | 18,540 | |
| Whole tax legal responsibility underneath the default tax regime u/s 115BAC(1A) | 4,82,040 | |
|
|
| |
| Non-obligatory tax regime (Common provisions of the Act) |
| |
| Gross wage | 30,00,000 | |
| Much less: normal deduction | 50,000 | |
| Internet wage | 29,50,000 | |
| Much less: loss from home property | 2,00,000 | |
|
| 27,50,000 | |
| Curiosity revenue | 20,000 | |
| Gross Whole Revenue | 27,70,000 | |
| Much less: Chapter VI-A deductions |
| |
| 80C (PPF) | 1,50,000 |
|
| 80D (Mediclaim premium) | 25,000 |
|
| 80TTA (curiosity) | 10,000 |
|
|
| 1,85,000 | |
| Whole Revenue | 25,85,000 | |
|
|
| |
| Tax on complete revenue of Rs.25,85,000 | 5,88,000 | |
| Add: cess@4% | 23,520 | |
| Tax payable | 6,11,520 |
It may be seen that inspite of claiming curiosity deduction of Rs.2 lakh and chapter VI-A deductions of Rs.1.85 lakh, the tax payable by Mr. A is Rs.6,11,520 underneath the conventional provisions of the Act whereas underneath the default tax regime inspite of non-availability of deductions, the tax payable is barely Rs.4,82,040, which is decrease than the tax payable of Rs.6,11,520 payable underneath the common provisions by Rs.1,29,480.
Additionally, since there is no such thing as a requirement to make investments compulsorily for claiming tax deductions, the take residence pay underneath the default tax regime u/s 115BAC(1A) could be increased.
In a nutshell, the default tax regime u/s 115BAC(1A) is extra useful to a taxpayer though complete revenue is computed with out deductions and exemptions which can be found if he opts out and pays tax underneath the common provisions. That is due to the concessional tax slabs and charges underneath the default tax regime.
Circumstances the place determination on alternative of previous and new tax regime is to be taken after cautious analysis
It might be famous that in sure instances like, in case of assesses paying excessive lease and eligible for exemption u/s 10(13A) and having LTC profit u/s 10(5) in addition to deductions underneath Chapter VI-A, they have to do their calculations underneath each the default tax regime and elective tax regime and discover out which is extra useful to them.