Iran and the USA are set to carry discussions in Oman on Saturday to revive negotiations regarding Tehran’s advancing nuclear program. Nevertheless, even earlier than the talks start, there is a disagreement over the format of the negotiations.
US President Donald Trump claims there will likely be direct talks, whereas Iran’s international minister asserts they are going to be carried out not directly by a mediator.
In a submit on X, Iran’s international minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi stated, “Iran and the USA will meet in Oman on Saturday for oblique high-level talks. It’s as a lot a possibility as it’s a take a look at. The ball is in America’s courtroom.”
Though the excellence between direct and oblique talks could seem minor, it holds important weight. Oblique negotiations have made little headway since President Trump unilaterally withdrew the US from the 2018 nuclear cope with world powers throughout his first time period.
Trump has escalated tensions by imposing new sanctions on Iran as a part of his “most stress” technique. He has additionally hinted at the potential of navy motion in opposition to Iran, whereas expressing optimism about reaching a brand new deal by diplomatic means, together with writing a letter to Iran’s 85-year-old Supreme Chief, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
In response, Khamenei has warned that Iran would retaliate in opposition to any assault with its personal counterstrike.
Right here’s what it’s good to know concerning the letter, Iran’s nuclear program, and the longstanding tensions which have formed relations between Tehran and Washington for the reason that 1979 Islamic Revolution.
Why did Trump write the letter?
Trump despatched the letter to Khamenei on March 5, then gave a tv interview the subsequent day by which he acknowledged sending it. He stated: “I’ve written them a letter saying, ‘I hope you’re going to barter as a result of if we’ve to go in militarily, it’s going to be a horrible factor.’”
Since returning to the White Home, President Trump has been advocating for negotiations whereas concurrently rising sanctions and suggesting {that a} navy strike by both Israel or the US may goal Iran’s nuclear services.
Additionally Learn: The youngsters of Iran’s revolution nonetheless wish to go West
Throughout his first time period, a letter from Trump to Iran’s Supreme Chief provoked a robust and offended response.
In distinction, Trump’s letters to North Korean chief Kim Jong Un throughout his first time period led to face-to-face conferences, although these talks didn’t end in any agreements to curb Pyongyang’s nuclear arsenal or its missile program able to reaching the continental US.
How has Iran reacted?
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian rejected direct negotiations with the USA over Tehran’s nuclear program.
“We don’t keep away from talks; it’s the breach of guarantees that has induced points for us to this point,” Pezeshkian stated in televised remarks throughout a Cupboard assembly. “They need to show that they’ll construct belief.”
Khamenei seemingly reacted to feedback by Trump, renewing his risk of navy motion.
“They threaten to commit acts of mischief, however we aren’t completely sure that such actions will happen,” the supreme chief stated. “We don’t think about it extremely doubtless that hassle will come from the skin. Nevertheless, if it does, they are going to undoubtedly face a robust retaliatory strike.”
Iranian Overseas Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei went additional.
Additionally Learn: Donald Trump warns of ‘the plain’ if Iran nuclear talks fail: ‘Not one thing I wish to be concerned with’
“An open risk of ‘bombing’ by a Head of State in opposition to Iran is a stunning affront to the very essence of Worldwide Peace and Safety,” he wrote on the social platform X. “Violence breeds violence, peace begets peace. The US can select the course…; and concede to CONSEQUENCES.”
The state-owned Tehran Instances newspaper, with out citing a supply, claimed that Iran had “readied missiles with the aptitude to strike U.S.-related positions.” That is because the U.S. has stationed stealth B-2 bombers in Diego Garcia inside hanging distance of each Iran and Yemen’s Iranian-backed Houthi rebels, which America has been bombing intensely since March 15.
Why does the West fear about Iran’s nuclear program?
For many years, Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is meant for peaceable functions. Nevertheless, Iranian officers have more and more hinted at the potential of creating nuclear weapons. Presently, Iran enriches uranium to almost weapons-grade ranges of 60%, making it the one nation on the earth with out an energetic nuclear weapons program to take action.
Beneath the phrases of the 2015 nuclear deal, Iran was permitted to counterpoint uranium as much as 3.67% purity and to carry a uranium stockpile of 300 kilograms (661 kilos). In accordance with the most recent report from the Worldwide Atomic Vitality Company, Iran’s stockpile has grown to eight,294.4 kilograms (18,286 kilos), with a portion of it enriched to 60% purity.
Additionally Learn: Iran wants reform earlier than a revolution
U.S. intelligence companies assess that Iran has but to start a weapons program, however has “undertaken actions that higher place it to provide a nuclear gadget, if it chooses to take action.”
Ali Larijani, an adviser to Iran’s supreme chief, has warned in a televised interview that his nation has the aptitude to construct nuclear weapons, however it isn’t pursuing it and has no drawback with the Worldwide Atomic Vitality Company’s inspections. Nevertheless, he stated if the U.S. or Israel have been to assault Iran over the difficulty, the nation would don’t have any selection however to maneuver towards nuclear weapon improvement, as reported by Related Press.
“When you make a mistake concerning Iran’s nuclear problem, you’ll power Iran to take that path, as a result of it should defend itself,” he stated.
Why are relations so dangerous between Iran and the US?
Iran was as soon as one of many U.S.’s high allies within the Mideast beneath Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who bought American navy weapons and allowed CIA technicians to run secret listening posts monitoring the neighboring Soviet Union. The CIA had fomented a 1953 coup that cemented the shah’s rule.
In January 1979, the shah of Iran, gravely ailing with most cancers, fled the nation amid rising mass protests in opposition to his regime. This led to the Islamic Revolution, spearheaded by Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, establishing Iran’s theocratic authorities.
Later that very same 12 months, Iranian college college students stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, demanding the extradition of the shah. This incident triggered the 444-day hostage disaster, which resulted within the severance of diplomatic ties between Iran and the U.S. Throughout the Nineteen Eighties Iran-Iraq conflict, the U.S. supported Saddam Hussein, and within the so-called “Tanker Battle,” launched a one-day naval assault that considerably broken Iran’s maritime capabilities. The U.S. additionally shot down an Iranian industrial airliner throughout this era.
Since then, U.S.-Iran relations have fluctuated between hostility and cautious diplomacy. Relations briefly improved with the 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers, however tensions resurged after President Trump unilaterally pulled the U.S. out of the settlement, fueling ongoing conflicts within the Center East.
Oil issue
Earlier this week, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent met in Washington with representatives from 16 world banks and federal legislation enforcement companies to debate US sanctions coverage on Iran, specializing in efforts to cut back its oil exports.
Bessent acknowledged that the Trump administration is exerting most financial stress to disrupt Iran’s monetary networks, which assist Hamas and different militant teams throughout the Center East, in addition to Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
In March, the US Treasury imposed sanctions on tankers transporting Iranian oil and on a Chinese language “teapot” refinery for processing the crude. “Teapots” are small, impartial refineries in China, and China’s nationwide oil firm refineries have ceased buying Iranian oil because of sanction-related dangers.
Treasury Secretary Bessent highlighted the US sanctions in opposition to Shandong Shouguang Luqing Petrochemical Co., Ltd., a small refinery, and its CEO. The sanctions have been associated to the corporate’s buy and refinement of lots of of thousands and thousands of {dollars}’ value of Iranian crude oil, together with shipments linked to the Houthis and the Iranian Ministry of Protection and Armed Forces Logistics.
(With inputs from Related Press)
