Mint examines why this proposal by the Securities and Trade Board of India (Sebi) issues and what it may change for ESOPs.
What did the Sebi chairperson say, and why now?
Sebi chairperson Tuhin Kanta Pandey lately advised making a regulated venue the place shares of IPO-bound firms may commerce amongst personal traders earlier than itemizing, below clear guidelines. The timing is important: India’s IPO market raised practically ₹4.3 trillion in FY25, with extra listings forward.
Outdoors formal exchanges, nonetheless, early traders and workers with inventory choices (ESOPs) wrestle to money out, counting on the gray market—a casual, legally unsure channel. Sebi desires to interchange these dangerous trades with a clear, supervised system.
What issues exist right now?
Unregulated trades usually happen by means of casual brokers or discussion groups, resulting in counterparty danger, value opacity, possession disputes, failed settlements, and knowledge gaps.
“At present, unlisted trades face issues like info gaps, unclear possession or switch rights, and settlement dangers, all of which regulation can tackle,” mentioned Ashima Obhan, senior associate at Obhan & Associates. A proper system, she added, would allow smoother secondary gross sales and cleaner cap tables.
How would this assist ESOP holders?
Workers typically wait years for an IPO or acquisition to monetise vested inventory, dealing with complicated paperwork and unsure pricing.
“For ESOP holders and early traders, it may lastly unlock liquidity effectively earlier than IPOs, creating new wealth alternatives and reshaping exit methods,” mentioned Narinder Wadhwa, MD & CEO, SKI Capital. He famous {that a} regulated route may additionally strengthen hiring and retention by making fairness extra tangible.
A pilot platform may present interim, rules-based liquidity—partial exits, clear settlement timelines, and auditable trails—whereas curbing the dangers of right now’s gray market.
What about early traders?
Enterprise capital and different early backers typically wait 7-10 years for exits. A regulated venue may allow them to recycle capital sooner and enhance inner charges of return.
“A regulated platform would give flexibility to partially exit earlier than IPOs, which may release capital to reinvest/allocate into newer startups. Quicker exits make IRR extra engaging for LPs,” mentioned Brijesh Damodaran, managing associate, Auxano Capital.
“The platform may alter exit methods for present traders, as they’ll now promote their shares in a regulated atmosphere,” added Saurabh Bansal, founding father of Finatwork Funding Advisor, stating that present secondary offers typically occur at 30-80% reductions to the final priced spherical.
How would it not tackle grey-market points?
The plan would exchange opaque matchmaking with regulated brokerage below Sebi oversight, built-in with depositories and clearing programs.
“The patrons and sellers buying and selling in unlisted shares face a whole lot of challenges at current because of insufficient availability of knowledge,” mentioned Jyoti Prakash Gadia, MD, Resurgent India, citing mis-selling and misinformation as frequent pitfalls.
Current cases the place grey-market costs diverged sharply from IPO pricing underline the necessity for higher discovery.
For instance, some traders acquired shares of Mobikwik within the gray marketplace for as a lot as ₹850, solely to face steep losses when the corporate’s IPO was priced at ₹279. Equally, Swiggy traders paid as much as ₹500 per share within the unlisted market, which was a pointy markdown from its IPO value of ₹390. These instances underscore the unstable nature and speculative valuations of gray market trades.
Wadhwa mentioned the transfer may present actual value discovery, transparency, and safe settlement—the largest dangers in casual trades. Gadia added {that a} regulated mechanism matching orders at tentative costs, with correct disclosures and participation information, would scale back volatility born of rumours and synthetic demand.
What safeguards are wanted?
“Investor safety should come first,” mentioned Obhan, calling for strict KYC/AML checks; issuer disclosure of cap tables and ESOP overhang; insider-trading controls; escrow-based settlement; clear danger labels; and auditable grievance redress.
Damodaran sought audited financials, escrow-backed ensures, retail safeguards, and robust integration with depositories to make sure clear processes.
What are the critiques?
Some argue the transfer may legitimise hypothesis with out fixing core info gaps.
“Fairly than constructing a complete platform, the extra prudent safeguard can be to mandate stricter disclosure norms for firms actively contemplating an IPO and to restrict participation to accredited traders solely,” mentioned Tarun Singh, founder & MD, Intellectual Securities.
Singh advised a safe-harbour framework for present intermediaries as an alternative. “Compliance would naturally adapt to any new regulation, however it could add a layer of complexity for what is basically a marginal occasion in an organization’s lifecycle. The price‑advantage of such devoted infrastructure appears questionable.”
He additionally flagged low‑float manipulation dangers, messy cap‑desk T+1 settlement, and heavy depository integration for a short window.
What’s subsequent?
Pandey’s remarks counsel an in-principle course. Subsequent steps will doubtless contain consultations with exchanges, depositories, and the company affairs ministry.
“For the reason that proposition is to start out it on a pilot foundation, the problems of integration, pricing, and settlement ought to evolve with energetic participation of all stakeholders,” mentioned Gadia.
