Many ultra-processed meals have rather more than the beneficial each day consumption of sugar, salt and fats, a Mint evaluation of 21 merchandise in seven classes confirmed. Whereas breakfast cereals and flavoured yoghurt have extraordinarily excessive sugar content material, ready-to-make upma/poha flashed crimson on all three fronts: sugar, salt, and fats. Soya millet chips, burger patties and fried hen, whereas low in sugar, had excessive salt and fats. Whereas sugar drinks in India carry an general tax of 40% (28% GST plus 12% compensation tax), increased than the 10-20% tax that is widespread worldwide, ultra-processed and unhealthy meals don’t face the identical tax burden.
An item-wise GST evaluation by Mint reveals the variation in taxation. Sugary/caffeinated/carbonated drinks entice the best tax, whereas fruit juice drinks, truffles and cereals, amongst different gadgets, are taxed 12% or 18%. (An earlier evaluation by Mint Plain Details had discovered excessive sugar content material in ‘fruit drinks’).
Additionally learn: A sensible information that will help you reduce on processed meals
Outline and conquer
Public well being specialists stated there was a have to categorise unhealthy meals gadgets correctly and levy increased taxes. “We now have a cess on some merchandise like cola however not on all sugary drinks like fruit juices with added sugar. A extra coordinated coverage the place a ‘well being tax’ is imposed throughout all meals excessive in sugar, salt and fat could be helpful. These should additionally embrace native savoury meals (like samosas, kachoris and so on) and sweets,” stated Beena Varghese, a well being economist and guide on the World Well being Group.
Processed meals has a large share of the consumption basket of Indians, in keeping with the Family Consumption Expenditure Survey. The 2023-24 survey confirmed drinks, refreshments and processed meals had a 9.8% share in rural areas and an 11.1% share in city areas. Nonetheless, processed meals could not at all times be unhealthy. It’s ultra-processed meals, which undergoes heavy industrial processing and incorporates excessive ranges of unsaturated fats, salt and sugar (HFSS) together with components, that’s the actual fear. The dearth of a transparent definition results in ultra-processed meals being variously described as ‘junk meals’, ‘ready-to-eat meals’, ‘processed meals’ and ‘packaged meals’.
Additionally learn: All that it’s essential learn about ultra-processed meals
Regardless of a major improve within the consumption of ultra-processed meals, rules in India stay poor, with measures equivalent to front-of-the-pack labelling and standardised ingredient labelling but to be applied. In accordance with the YouGov-Mint-CPR Millennial Survey, performed in July 2024, almost a 3rd of city Indians felt it was okay to eat processed meals continuously.
This elevated consumption might exacerbate well being issues in India. Almost 40% of grownup Indians have already got stomach weight problems and 24% excessive levels of cholesterol, in keeping with a 2023 examine by the Indian Council of Medical Analysis (ICMR).
A high-quality stability
Whereas a ‘well being tax’ is seen as a technique to curb the consumption of ultra-processed meals, analysis by Varghese and her co-authors in a 2023 paper titled ‘Estimating the potential influence of a well being tax on the demand for unhealthy meals and drinks and on tax income in India’ reveals that an aggressive 20-30% well being tax is be wanted to curb demand considerably. Nonetheless, a well being tax, if levied, needs to be applied rigorously as it could disproportionately have an effect on India’s poor.
Additionally learn: The brand new science on what ultra-processed meals does to your mind
“Research from different international locations suggests there’s a fall in consumption because of such taxation, however the fall is rather more within the lower-income class, which is very delicate to cost modifications,” stated Soumitra Ghosh, a well being economist and affiliate professor on the Tata Institute of Social Sciences. “One must be cautious about whom such a tax might find yourself hurting”. Ghosh stated India should be taught from its expertise of excessive taxation/bans on alcohol, which noticed many customers choosing cheaper, typically unrecorded and lower-quality alternate options.
On this context, Denmark affords a cautionary story. In 2011, the nation launched a tax on meals excessive in saturated fat, generally described because the world’s first “fats tax”, however deserted it because it drove up costs and led to job losses, whereas its function in curbing consumption was restricted and short-term.
Because the Financial Survey advised, a multi-pronged strategy is required to handle the problem – tighter regulation, stricter labelling, improved monitoring of branded merchandise, safety towards deceptive promoting, and consciousness campaigns, and a well being tax.
