(Bloomberg) — The US Supreme Court docket turned away a recent gun-rights enchantment, refusing to query the District of Columbia’s ban on large-capacity ammunition-feeding gadgets.
The justices on Friday rejected arguments from 4 firearms house owners who mentioned the ban violates the gun-rights protections within the Structure’s Second Modification.
On June 2, the excessive courtroom rejected an identical enchantment in a Rhode Island case together with a problem to a Maryland ban on so-called assault weapons. In every case, the courtroom fell one vote wanting the 4 required to take up a brand new case.
Along with DC, 14 states outlaw high-capacity ammunition-feeding gadgets, in response to Giffords Legislation Middle, an curiosity group that helps gun restrictions.
The DC regulation makes it a felony to own gun magazines that may maintain greater than 10 rounds. It was enacted within the aftermath of the Supreme Court docket’s landmark 2008 determination placing down the district’s handgun ban and for the primary time saying the Structure protects particular person gun rights.
A federal trial choose after which an appeals courtroom upheld the DC restrictions.
Gun-rights advocates who sued to dam the DC measure sought to increase the 2022 Supreme Court docket determination that declared a constitutional proper to hold a firearm and established a troublesome new check for assessing restrictions.
The challengers mentioned People possess lots of of tens of millions of large-capacity magazines, lots of them for self-defense functions. Supporters of the bans say the gadgets have been repeatedly utilized in mass shootings.
The regulation was backed on the decrease courtroom degree by Everytown for Gun Security, an advocacy group based and backed by Michael Bloomberg, founder and majority proprietor of Bloomberg Information dad or mum firm Bloomberg LP.
The case is Hanson v. District of Columbia, 24-936.
Extra tales like this can be found on bloomberg.com
