Amid the continuing earnings season, each meals supply platforms — Everlasting (Zomato) and Swiggy — have reported respectable monetary numbers for the fourth quarter of the monetary yr ended March 2026.
In keeping with market consultants, This autumn FY26 reveals each gamers scaling, however with diverging margin trajectories and enterprise mixes.
Whereas Everlasting posted sharp income and revenue development led by Blinkit, Swiggy reported regular enlargement in meals supply and bettering economics in Instamart, whilst losses within the phase remained elevated.
Zomato vs Swiggy: This autumn outcomes highlights
Zomato This autumn outcomes 2026
Zomato‘s revenue surged 346% year-on-year (YoY) to ₹174 crore from ₹39 crore in the identical quarter final yr.
In the meantime, Everlasting posted a 196% YoY leap in Q4FY26 income to ₹17,292 crore throughout the identical interval. Everlasting’s sturdy topline enlargement was largely pushed by its fast commerce arm, Blinkit, which not too long ago transitioned to an inventory-led mannequin.
Blinkit posted a 95% YoY rise in internet order worth (NOV) to ₹14,386 crore throughout 2,243 shops, whereas turning EBITDA optimistic at ₹37 crore in comparison with ₹4 crore within the earlier quarter.
B2C NOV rose 54% YoY to ₹26,880 crore and adjusted income surged 186% YoY to ₹17,680 crore, or 64% YoY on a like-for-like foundation. Adjusted EBITDA jumped 160% YoY to ₹429 crore, whereas the corporate’s money reserves stood at ₹17,972 crore.
The meals supply phase noticed NOV develop 19% YoY to ₹9,757 crore, with EBITDA growing 24% YoY to ₹532 crore and margins bettering to five.5% of NOV — 220 foundation factors increased than Swiggy.
Swiggy This autumn outcomes 2026
Swiggy reported its strongest meals supply efficiency in practically 4 years, with GOV rising 22.6% YoY to ₹9,005 crore and adjusted EBITDA growing 39.8% YoY to ₹297 crore. Annual meals supply adjusted EBITDA crossed ₹1,000 crore for the primary time, with margins reaching a document 3.3% of GOV.
The platform’s month-to-month transacting customers (MTUs) grew 27.2% YoY to 25.2 million, whereas meals supply MTUs climbed 21% YoY to 18.3 million, indicating sturdy buyer retention. Its Out-of-Home-based business additionally turned worthwhile in FY26, pushed by 43% YoY GOV development and an EBITDA margin of 0.8%, rising as a 3rd worthwhile phase for the corporate.
Swiggy reported a forty five% YoY rise in consolidated income for Q4FY26 at ₹6,383 crore, in comparison with ₹4,410 crore a yr in the past.
Instamart continued to stay within the funding section, though efficiency improved considerably. GOV jumped 68.8% YoY to ₹7,881 crore, common order worth (AOV) elevated 32.8% YoY to ₹700, and contribution margin improved by 65 foundation factors sequentially to -1.8%, with the March exit margin narrowing additional to -1.1%.
Nevertheless, adjusted EBITDA loss stood at ₹858 crore, holding consolidated losses elevated whilst total income grew 45% YoY to ₹6,383 crore and losses narrowed by ₹281 crore in comparison with final yr.
On a consolidated foundation, Everlasting outpaced Swiggy as Blinkit continued to witness explosive development throughout segments, whereas Swiggy’s Instamart recorded an adjusted income enhance of simply over 30%, considerably decrease than Blinkit’s multifold development.
Zomato vs Swiggy: Which inventory to purchase after This autumn outcomes?
In keeping with Seema Srivastava, Senior Analysis Analyst at SMC International Securities, risk-tolerant traders could favor Swiggy for increased meals/QC development and potential margin catch-up, however Everlasting is the safer long-term compounder given scale, optimistic fast commerce unit economics, and superior capital effectivity right now.
“For the long run, Everlasting gives a clearer path to consolidated profitability with meals supply already at 5.5% EBITDA margins, Blinkit turning optimistic, and a ₹17,972 crore money cushion to fund enlargement. Swiggy has stronger meals supply GOV development at 22.6% vs Zomato’s 19% and worthwhile OOH, however Instamart’s ₹858 crore EBITDA loss means group-level breakeven is additional away. Swiggy’s 3.3% meals margin vs Zomato’s 5.5% additionally reveals an execution hole. A staggered entry on dips in both works, with obese to Everlasting for profitability visibility,” Srivastava mentioned.
Sugandha Sachdeva, Founding father of SS WealthStreet, whereas choosing Zomato, mentioned that the corporate reported a powerful set of This autumn FY26 outcomes, reflecting sturdy operational momentum; nevertheless, the inventory continues to face technical resistance close to the ₹265 zone.
“From a technical perspective, until the inventory sustains above the ₹265-270 zone on a weekly closing foundation, a pointy upside transfer seems unlikely, and the inventory could proceed to witness consolidation or intermittent declines,” Sachdeva mentioned.
She additional beneficial that traders undertake a extra prudent method, which might be to attend for dips in the direction of the ₹215-216 zone for recent accumulation, whereas holding an in depth watch on the important thing assist round ₹190, which stays a powerful long-term base on the month-to-month chart. “Alternatively, a decisive breakout above ₹270 would sign renewed bullish momentum and open the door for additional upside,” she mentioned.
Disclaimer: This story is for instructional functions solely. The views and proposals above are these of particular person analysts or broking firms, not Mint. We advise traders to examine with licensed consultants earlier than making any funding selections.
